ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / DENIALS / THE DOCUMENTS / AMERICAN INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
CIVIL REMEDY NOTICE, FILED BY THE POLICYHOLDER WITH FLORIDA DFS

American Integrity: an adjuster came out, but the filing says the loss was never really adjusted

UPDATED 2026-08-23 FL NOT LEGAL ADVICE
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT IS

This is a Civil Remedy Notice: a complaint the POLICYHOLDER filed against the insurer with Florida’s Department of Financial Services. It describes the denial in the policyholder’s words and starts a 60-day clock for the carrier to respond. It is not the insurer’s letter.

Read the regulator filing

Opens the published document this page is built from, on the source's own site.

REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE · MATCHED TO THE ARGUMENT, NOT THE CLAIM
FROM THE FILINGVERBATIM · PUBLIC RECORD
“While the insurer did send an adjuster to evaluate the damages, there was no genuine adjustment of the claim by the insurer. That is to say, the insurer did not adjust the loss to include obviously related damages or ensuing damages related to Hurricane Ian.”
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 686293 (Hill/Laughlin v. American Integrity), Cape Coral, FL · read the full document ↗
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT

A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.

So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.

01WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY
Who the filing is against AMERICAN INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA (NAIC #12841)
Who filed it The policyholder
Attorney of record Monica Sablon
Where the property is Cape Coral, Florida
When it was accepted by the state April 3, 2023
When the 60-day cure window closed June 2, 2023
Why, in the state’s own categories Claim Denial, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice
Type of insurance Residential Property & Casualty
Policy language at issue The specific policy language relevant to the insurer's misconduct and violations is the Loss Payment provision and the coverage that is afforded under Coverage A-Dwelling of the policy, as well as the coverage afforded under the "[name redacted] (s), [name redacted] (s), and Screen Enclosure(s)."
Did the insurer respond Yes, on September 20, 2023
02WHAT THE FILING SAYS HAPPENED
THE POLICYHOLDER'S ACCOUNT, QUOTED FROM THE FILING

The violations alleged are based failure to pay the claim in full and relevant to the insurer's misconduct is the Loss Payment provision and coverage afforded under Coverage A-Dwelling of the policy. The persons representing the insurer most responsible for and/or knowledgeable of the facts giving rise to the allegations herein are [name redacted] . The specific policy language relevant to the insurer's misconduct and violations is the Loss Payment provision and the coverage that is afforded under Coverage A-Dwelling of the policy. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the violations are: The insured's claim results from windstorm and water, with ensuing damages, caused by hurricane Ian on or about September 28, 2022, to the insured property located at [address redacted], Cape Coral, Florida. The insureds reported the loss to American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "the insurer"). While the insurer did send an adjuster to evaluate the damages, there was no genuine adjustment of the claim by the insurer. That is to say, the insurer did not adjust the loss to include obviously related damages or ensuing damages related to Hurricane Ian. Not made whole by the insurer, the insured has been forced to seek legal counsel to protect the insureds' interests. The insured requested that the insurer provide coverage for the insureds' damaged pool screen enclosure, but the insureds have been informed no coverage would be extended or afforded. In stark contrast, the declarations page of the relevant insurance policy for which this insured paid a premium clearly reflects additional, which the insureds paid a $43.00 premium, to receive $10,000.00 of coverage for "[name redacted] (s), [name redacted] (s), and Screen Enclosure(s)." The insureds' informed the insurer of its inaccurate and detrimental determination that there is indeed coverage under this particular insurance policy for damage to screen enclosures at the insured property. The insureds repeatedly informed the insurer of their claim, including in writing on December 21, 2022, to no avail. To date, the insurer failed to acknowledge claims communications and supply information or correct the misapplication of coverage by stating that coverage would be extended for the screen enclosure. The aforementioned conduct is an example of misconduct consistent with unfair claim settlement practices as well as failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims. This conduct is also a specific example of this insurer not attempting in good faith to settle this insureds' claim when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her and his interests. The failure of the insurer to extend coverage that is obviously listed on the declarations page, coupled with having been given an opportunity to inspect and investigate the claim, and still refusing the extend coverage is bad faith, unfair trade practices, improper investigation and unfair claim settlement practices, which demonstrate the insurer not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for their interests. The insurer failed to adopt proper standards of investigation and adjustment of losses and is otherwise not implementing those standards because full payment and prompt payment for the loss is not occurring and the adjustment has been improper demonstrating unfair trade practices and unfair claim settlement practices. In addition, when the insurer was asked for copies of the policy and claim communications, it failed to comply with the insureds' request through their counsel. The insureds give this notice in order to perfect the right to pursue the civil remedy authorized by section 624.155, Florida Statutes, in order to cure the conduct giving rise to the violations described herein, the insurer must complete the proper evaluation of the damages and issue payment for all the covered damages.

03THE LAWS THE FILING SAYS WERE BROKEN

These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.

624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(i) Failing to pay personal injury protection insurance claims within the time periods required by s. 627.736(4)(b).
04WHAT THE INSURER ANSWERED

Filed with the state on September 20, 2023. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.

Read the insurer's response in full

Per the parties' agreement, Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations 686293 is hereby withdrawn.

05-27-2023

May 27, 2023

Via Electronic Submission

Florida Department of Financial Services Consumer Assistance Civil Remedy Section Larson Building [address redacted]reet Tallahassee, FL 32399-0322

[name redacted] Sablon, Esq. [address redacted] Fort Myers, FL 33905

Re: DFS File No: 686293 Complainant: [name redacted] Insured: [name redacted] Policy no. [redacted] Insurer: American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida Claim no. [redacted]

To Whom It May Concern:

We are in receipt of the Civil Remedy Notice ("CRN") filed by [name redacted] Sablon, Esq.on behalf of the above referenced Complainant and matter. The Florida Department of Financial Services ("DFS") accepted the CRN on March 30, 2023 and assigned it DFS File No. of 686293.

While American Integrity asserts that the subject CRN is legally insufficient and non-compliant with Florida law, American Integrity, without waiving any arguments regarding same, contends that it has at all times performed its obligations under the insurance policy in a prompt and diligent manner with due regard for the interest of its Insured, [name redacted] . The CRN contains a list of purported violations which are alleged to have been committed by American Integrity. In fact, none of the listed violations/allegations have occurred and/or are irrelevant to the alleged violations and American Integrity categorically denies any violations of §624.155 and §626.9541, Fla. Stat., as well as any and all other statutes/regulations/codes/rules contained in the CRN. In addition, American Integrity denies any and all allegations of any kind and/or any inferences therefrom referenced and/or contained in the CRN. American Integrity believes this response adequately addresses the allegations and violations contained within the CRN. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Sincerely,

[name redacted] Esq. Senior Vice President of Litigation American Integrity Insurance Group

cc: [name redacted] Sablon, Esq.via email at: CRN Response

If this document contains an excerpt from an American Integrity Insurance Policy ("the Policy") it is provided here for informational purposes only. This excerpt is not the official version of the Policy. The official version of the Policy is the policy issued to the Insureds on the policy effective date. In the event there is inconsistency between this document and the Policy, the Policy shall serve as the official version.

Any person who knowingly and with intent to injure, defraud, or deceive any insurer files a statement of claim or an application containing any false, incomplete, or misleading information is guilty of a felony of the third degree. F.S. 817.234

Acknowledgement

The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 686293. Read the filing on the state's site ↗

A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

07WHY THIS ONE IS IN THE ARCHIVE

A Cape Coral Ian claim where the carrier denied the screen enclosure, the single most common Ian loss item in Lee County, while the policyholder’s own declarations page showed a $10,000 screened-enclosure endorsement, purchased for $43 in premium.

The counter here is not an argument, it is a document: the dec page. When a denial contradicts an endorsement the carrier itself sold, the response letter writes itself, and the DFS Civil Remedy filing shows exactly that play being run.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
ANSWER THIS ARGUMENT
SOURCE

Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 686293 (Hill/Laughlin v. American Integrity), Cape Coral, FL · public record ↗

Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

02 · FREE LETTER REVIEW

Got a letter like this one?

Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.

The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW