A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.
So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.
| Who the filing is against | HERITAGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (NAIC #14407) |
|---|---|
| Who filed it | The policyholder |
| Attorney of record | Jorge Carbonell |
| Where the property is | Fort Myers, Florida |
| When it was accepted by the state | December 2, 2024 |
| When the 60-day cure window closed | January 31, 2025 |
| Why, in the state’s own categories | Claim Delay, Claim Denial, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice |
| Type of insurance | Residential Property & Casualty |
| Policy language at issue | Specific policy language relevant to the violation: Specific policy language that is believed to be relevant to the violations includes, but is not limited to, the following: All provisions of Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company's policy no. [redacted], including but not limited to: Section I - Perils Insured Against: "We insure against risk of direct loss to property…"; "… This includes the cost to tear out and replace any part of a building, or other structure, on the "residence premises", but only when necessary to repair the system or appliance …"; Section I - Conditions: "We will adjust all losses with you."; "Covered property losses are settled … at actual cash value at the time of loss …" |
| Did the insurer respond | Yes, on December 27, 2024 |
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation: This notice is given in order to perfect the right of the insured, [name redacted] to pursue the civil remedy authorized by Fla. Stat. §624.155 against her insurer, Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company ("Heritage"). Heritage has failed and/or refused to thoroughly, accurately, and completely investigate and evaluate the claim of loss of its insured. This claim arises from covered damages sustained by the insured from a Hurricane Ian loss and ensuing damage occurring on or about September 28, 2022. On or about that date, the insured property suffered extensive interior and exterior damage as a result of the covered hurricane loss. Heritage was timely notified of the loss, assigned claim no. [redacted], and investigated the loss. The insured fully cooperated with Heritage during the investigation including inspections by Heritage's Field Adjuster. Heritage then opened coverage for claim no. [redacted] and made a partial payment in the amount of $2,281.76. However, said payment was woefully inadequate. Despite repeated pleas and opportunity for Heritage to make a supplemental payment, Heritage has failed and/or refused to fully indemnify the insured for the covered loss. The actions and claims practices of Heritage with respect to the subject claim rise to the level of bad faith and warrant ethical discipline by DFS. To date, notwithstanding the insured's pleas otherwise, Heritage has failed and refused to pay all insurance benefits due and owing under the policy and has failed and refused to restore the insured's property to its pre-loss condition. As a result, the insured was left with no choice but to file a lawsuit against Heritage for its breach of the insurance policy in failing to pay the actual value of the loss. The facts of this matter are simple. The insured suffered massive damage to her property caused by a covered hurricane loss. Heritage has refused to issue a supplemental payment and/or fully indemnify the insured regarding claim no. [redacted] for covered hurricane damage which occurred on September 28, 2022. The policy clearly and unambiguously provides coverage for the insured's loss, which includes the cost of tearing out and replacing any part of the insured's property when necessary. To date, Heritage has failed and/or refused to provide the insured with all the insurance benefits due and owing, despite knowing that the insured has sustained covered damage to her insured property. Despite the insured's repeated pleas, Heritage has not tendered the full amount needed to repair the property or issue adequate payment to the insured under the policy. Implicit within every insurance policy is a duty of good faith and fair dealing. However, Heritage has failed to comply with those obligations in connection with this claim. Instead, Heritage has looked for ways not to pay the claim in full and these actions have been to the detriment of the insured. Heritage has a contractual obligation to make a thorough investigation, not ignoring evidence that would support the insured's claim. This is a breach of the policy. Heritage has a contractual obligation not to look the other way when confronted with facts revealing the possibility of coverage and resisting reasonable interpretations of its policy, this is a breach of the policy. The concept of insurance is that insurance is the insurer's granting of timely and prompt indemnity or security against a contingent loss. Florida Statute § 624.02 defines "insurance" as a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay or allow specified amount or a determinable benefit upon determinable contingencies. Inherent is the fact that payment must be made timely and promptly so that the insured may mitigate her damages and be placed back into the position she was in prior to the loss as quickly as possible. Heritage has breached this duty. Heritage has refused and/or failed to tender all insurance proceeds to the insured upon demand. Heritage's refusal and/or failure to settle the insurance claim when under all circumstances it could have and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly towards the Insured is wrongful conduct. Further, the insured contends that Heritage's adjusters and/or representatives financially benefit by such wrongful conduct. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, Heritage must: create and implement adequate guidelines for proper investigation and evaluation as to claims handling and for the training and supervision of employees, which will avoid future statutory violations as set forth above, and prevent such violations from occurring in the future. Heritage must create and implement adequate guidelines for the proper investigation and evaluation of these types of claims, and for the training and supervision of employees with regard to these types of claims to ensure Heritage's claims handling procedures with regard to these types of losses are adequate to prevent other insureds from being treated unfairly and wrongfully. Heritage must act fairly and honestly towards the insured and with due regard for her best interests in attempting to settle the insured's claim. Heritage must immediately tender all insurance benefits due and owing to the insured under the policy pursuant to the relevant policy provisions provided therein that would reasonably place the insured's property back to its pre-loss condition, including, but not limited to all interest due and owing under applicable Florida Statutes and all attorney's fees and costs incurred by the insured because of the bad faith conduct of Heritage. Heritage must pay the insured the fair value of her insurance claim.
These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.
| 624.155(1)(b)(1) | Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests. |
|---|---|
| 624.155(1)(b)(3) | Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage. |
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) | Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims. |
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) | Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information. |
Filed with the state on December 27, 2024. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.
Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 794830. Read the filing on the state's site ↗
A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
The supplemental refusal is the quiet second denial most claims meet: the initial payment lands, repairs begin, the real scope surfaces, and the request for the difference goes nowhere. This Fort Myers filing states it plainly: covered hurricane damage, a refusal to supplement or fully indemnify.
Florida’s clock makes supplementals urgent in a way the refusal letters never mention: 18 months from the date of loss to submit a supplemental claim under Fla. Stat. 627.70132, and the same 60-day pay-or-deny duty applies to the supplemental as to the original. A refusal without a written policy basis fails the same statutory floor as any denial. Heritage is the volume leader in this database, 1,788 residential claim-denial Civil Remedy Notices in the fifteen months after Ian, and this entry is one of three Heritage documents in the library.
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 794830 (Polanco v. Heritage P&C), Fort Myers, FL · public record ↗
Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.
The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.
A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.
▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.