ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / DENIALS / THE DOCUMENTS / HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
CIVIL REMEDY NOTICE, FILED BY THE POLICYHOLDER WITH FLORIDA DFS

Homeowners Choice: a $41,800 estimate, then a denial anyway

UPDATED 2026-08-21 FL NOT LEGAL ADVICE
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT IS

This is a Civil Remedy Notice: a complaint the POLICYHOLDER filed against the insurer with Florida’s Department of Financial Services. It describes the denial in the policyholder’s words and starts a 60-day clock for the carrier to respond. It is not the insurer’s letter.

Read the regulator filing

Opens the published document this page is built from, on the source's own site.

REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE · MATCHED TO THE ARGUMENT, NOT THE CLAIM
FROM THE FILINGVERBATIM · PUBLIC RECORD
“Despite agreeing that the Insured Property sustained damage by Hurricane Helene at least in the amount of $41,800.28 (ACV) via its own estimate, Homeowners chose to wrongfully deny the claim; production of the estimate should not be construed as an approval or denial of coverage.”
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 794905 (Little v. Homeowners Choice), Cedar Key, FL · read the full document ↗
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT

A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.

So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.

01WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY
Who the filing is against HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. (NAIC #12944)
Who filed it The policyholder
Attorney of record Erin Dunnavant
Where the property is Cedar Key, Florida
When it was accepted by the state December 2, 2024
When the 60-day cure window closed January 31, 2025
Why, in the state’s own categories Claim Delay, Claim Denial, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice
Type of insurance Residential Property & Casualty
Policy language at issue Upon information and belief, the Insured believes that the policy language relevant to [name redacted] ' violations includes the following provisions of Policy no. [redacted], including: From the Declarations: a) Coverage A - Dwelling Protection $354,000 b) Coverage B - Other Structures Protection $7,080 c) Coverage C - Personal [name redacted] Protection $88,500 d) Coverage D - Loss of Use $35,400 … [name redacted] Coverage (Place of Residence) Limit of Insurance: $354,000 … Personal [name redacted] Coverage Limit of Insurance: $88,500 … [name redacted] of Coverage (continued) The above Limit of Insurance, deductibles, and Loss Settlement Basis apply to the following perils insured against: (Items marked below Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS included, those marked N (No) indicate coverage is NOT included) … Y Hurricane … SECTION I - [name redacted] COVERAGE Coverage A - [name redacted] against covered loss to your dwelling and structures attached to your dwelling. It also protects against covered loss to building materials located on your residence premises which are being used in connection with your residence premises. … Coverage C - Personal [name redacted] Protects against covered loss to your personal [name redacted] such as clothing and furniture…. … [name redacted] COVERAGES A. Coverage A - Dwelling 1. We cover: a. The dwelling on the "residence premises" shown in the Declarations, including structures attached to the dwelling; and b. Materials and supplies located on or next to the "residence premises" used to construct, alter or repair the dwelling or other structures on the "residence premises". … C. Coverage C - Personal [name redacted] 1. Covered [name redacted] We cover personal [name redacted] owned or used by an "insured" while it is anywhere in the world. … PERIL INSURED AGAINST 1. We insure for direct physical loss to the [name redacted] described in Coverages A, B and C caused only by the peril of windstorm or hail unless the loss is excluded in EXCLUSIONS. VIII. TO ENABLE THE INSURER TO INVESTIGATE AND RESOLVE YOUR CLAIM, DESCRIBE THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE INSURER'S VIOLATION AS YOU UNDERSTAND THEM AT THIS TIME. In addition of the above statutory provisions alleged to have been violated, see also the following statutes and rules: 624.155(1)(a)1 Any person may bring a civil action against an insurer when such person is damaged: (a) by violation of any of the following provisions by the insurer: (1) Section 626.9541(1)(i), (o), or (x) 69B-220.201(3)(b)(2) An adjuster shall adjust all claims strictly in accordance with the Insurance contract. 69B-220.201(3)(c) An adjuster shall not approach investigations, adjustments, and settlements in a manner prejudicial to the insured. 69B-220.201(3)(d) An adjuster shall make truthful and unbiased reports of the facts after making a complete investigation. 626.877 Every adjuster shall adjust or investigate every claim, damage, or loss made or occurring under an insurance contract, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract and of the applicable laws of this state. 626.878 An adjuster shall subscribe to the code of ethics specified in the rules of the department. The rules shall implement the provisions of this part and specify the terms and conditions of contracts, including a right to cancel, and require practices necessary to ensure fair dealing, prohibit conflicts of interest, and ensure preservation of the rights of the claimant to participate in the adjustment of claims. 624.155(5) No punitive damages shall be awarded under this section unless the acts giving rise to the violation occur with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice and these acts are: (a) Willful, wanton and malicious; (b) In reckless disregard for the rights of any insured; or (c) In reckless disregard for the rights of a beneficiary under a life insurance contract.
Did the insurer respond Yes, on January 30, 2025
02WHAT THE FILING SAYS HAPPENED
THE POLICYHOLDER'S ACCOUNT, QUOTED FROM THE FILING

On or about September 26, 2024, the [name redacted] located [address redacted], [name redacted] Florida ("the Insured [name redacted] ") belonging to [name redacted] (Doug) [name redacted] ("the Insured" or "Mr. [name redacted] ") sustained damage resulting from Hurricane Helene. Mr. [name redacted] promptly reported the loss to his [name redacted] insurer, [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. ("[name redacted] ") upon discovering the loss. [name redacted] ' administrative, home, and mailing address is registered as [address redacted]ive, Tampa, Florida. [name redacted] assigned claim examiner, [name redacted] to Mr. [name redacted] 's loss. Ms. Lobel sent out field adjuster, [name redacted] to inspect the Insured [name redacted] to prepare an estimate of damages on behalf of the insurer. On or about October 3, 2024, Mr. Rowen inspected the Insured [name redacted] on behalf of [name redacted] . He subsequently prepared an estimate of damages dated October 5, 2024, with an RCV of $46,027.39 and an ACV of $41,800.28 as to his assessment of losses caused directly by Hurricane Helene. On or about October 16, 2024, Ms. Lobel sent correspondence to Mr. [name redacted] enclosing a copy of Mr. Rowen's estimate pursuant to section 627.70131(3)(e), Florida Statutes. However, she made it clear that production of [name redacted] ' estimate should not "be construed as an approval or denial of coverage or acceptance of the scope of damages" by the insurer. Following public backlash of Heritage [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company in response to the 60 Minutes report on its apparent manipulation of adjuster estimates during Hurricane Ian claims, the Florida Legislature promulgated section 627.70131(3)(e), Florida Statutes, requiring carriers to provide an Insured a copy of the insurer's estimate if one is prepared regardless of the carrier's ultimate coverage decision. It is evident that this is why [name redacted] produced Mr. [name redacted] a copy of its estimate but did not provide a coverage decision as to his claim. In any event, due to the severity of damage sustained by Hurricane Helene, Mr. [name redacted] was skeptical of [name redacted] ' adjustment and estimate of damages as to the full amount of losses incurred to the Insured [name redacted] . Mr. [name redacted] retained Silverhall LLC ("Silverhall") to conduct emergency (temporary) repairs to the deck of the Insured [name redacted] in compliance with the Duties After Loss provision of his insurance policy. Silverhall has been retained to make permanent repairs to the deck but they're awaiting a permit. Silverhall has completed some repairs on the ground floor, as well as some framing of walls, and electric in part. However, the staircase has not yet been repaired. In addition, he retained Griston Claim Management ("Griston") and [name redacted] Contractors, LLC ("GBC") to conduct separate and independent inspections of the Insured [name redacted] to review and incorporate the incurred repairs by Silverhall. Griston also evaluated the personal [name redacted] at the Insured [name redacted] which was damaged as a result of Hurricane Helene and prepared a loss inventory for the Insured. GBC ascertained that the full scope of covered losses to the Dwelling amounts to $185,894.13 as the costs required to fully and adequately restore the Insured [name redacted] to a pre-loss condition. Ultimately, despite agreeing that the Insured [name redacted] sustained damage by Hurricane Helene at least in the amount of $41,800.28 (ACV) via its own estimate, [name redacted] chose to wrongfully deny the claim. In sum, the Insured timely reported his claim for the damage and loss to [name redacted] complied with [name redacted] ' requests including allowing [name redacted] to inspect his Insured [name redacted] . Based on its failure to adequately pay this claim or instruct it preferred vendor to complete repairs, it is readily apparent that [name redacted] has failed to create and implement adequate guidelines for proper claims investigation, claims evaluation, claims handling, and for training and supervision of employees and independent contractors handlings its claims resulting in statutory violations as set forth above. [name redacted] has failed and/or refused to thoroughly, accurately, and completely investigate and evaluate the Insured's' claim for damages. The concept of insurance is that it is the insurer's granting of timely and prompt indemnity or security against a contingent loss. Fla. Stat. §624.02 defines insurance as a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay or allow specified amount or a determinable benefit upon determinable contingencies. Inherent is the fact that payment must be made timely and promptly so that Insured may mitigate his damages and be put back into the position they were in prior to the loss as quickly as possible. [name redacted] has failed to comply with its duty to indemnify the Insured. [name redacted] has failed and/or refused to timely adjust, repair, and pay the Insured's insurance claim for damages. [name redacted] has refused and/or failed to pay any insurance proceeds to date owed to the Insured as required by the policy and law. Refusal and/or failure to pay or/and settle the Insured's claim when under all the circumstances it could have and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly towards the Insured is wrong. The actions taken by [name redacted] /or its representatives in the handling and adjustment of the Insured's claim were willful, wanton, and in disregard for the rights of its Insured and occur with such a frequency as to indicate a general business practice, and further, are in violation of Florida Statutes §624.155 and §626.9541. Based on the foregoing actions and omissions, [name redacted] has engaged in wrongful claims handling conduct, including but not limited to, the following:

1. Improper claim denial;

2. Improper claim delays;

3. Not conducting a full and fair investigation of the Insured's claim;

4. Looking for ways to deny recovery to the Insured;

5. Looking for ways to delay recovery to the Insured;

6. Overlooking covered damages to the Insured [name redacted] upon an initial review of the loss and damages;

7. Failing to pay the necessary amounts due and owing to restore the Insured [name redacted] to its pre-loss condition;

8. Not adjusting the claim and not evaluating the loss properly, promptly, and fairly so as to provide full and prompt indemnity to its Insured.

9. Failing to implement proper standards for the adjustment and investigation of insurance claims; 10. Failing to pay the requisite monies owed for the Insured's loss. 11. Not training, supervising or managing adjusters and independent contractors properly so that prompt and full payments are made, but rather placing the company's interests before the policyholders' interests by attempting to deny or minimize payments owed; 12. Establishing severity control initiatives and otherwise establishing a culture of not fully and promptly paying claims following losses. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, [name redacted] must: Tender the full amount of insurance monies owed to the Insured for the Hurricane Helene loss and resulting damage to the Insured [name redacted] . A copy of this form has been submitted to the FDFS and has been printed out and mailed to the following parties providing them notice of the filing of the Civil Remedy Notice: cc: [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. via Certified Mail, R.R.R. [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. via U.S. Mail Claims Dept, [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. via Certified Mail, R.R.R. Supervisors, [name redacted] & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. via U.S. [name redacted] Lobel, Claims Examiner via Certified Mail, R.R.R. [name redacted] (Doug) [name redacted] via electronic mail

WHAT THE FILING DEMANDS THE INSURER DO TO FIX IT

Tender the full amount of insurance monies owed to the Insured for the Hurricane Helene loss and resulting damage to the Insured [name redacted] .

03THE LAWS THE FILING SAYS WERE BROKEN

These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.

624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
04WHAT THE INSURER ANSWERED

Filed with the state on January 30, 2025. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.

Read the insurer's response in full

This is [name redacted] & Insurance Company's ("HCPCI") response to the Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations ("CRN") filed by [name redacted] Dunnavant, Esq. on behalf of [name redacted] (Doug) [name redacted] ("Insured").

HCPCI reviewed this CRN and conducted a thorough review of the subject claim ("claim") and confirmed it handled the claim properly. Under the relevant facts and circumstances, the applicable insurance contract did not provide coverage for the claim. Ultimately, HCPCI handled the claim in accordance with the policy and all statutory and regulatory requirements. HCPCI denies each allegation of bad faith and improper conduct in the CRN. At all times, HCPCI acted in good faith, fairly and honestly toward the Insured and with due regard for the Insured's interests.

Otherwise, the CRN is deficient. Generally, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 624.155, CRNs must identify and set forth statutory provisions insurers allegedly violated in handling insureds' insurance claims along with specific, relevant insurance contract language and facts and circumstances. The foregoing provides insurers with notice of alleged statutory violations AND the opportunity to cure such alleged violations. Instead of complying with Florida Statutes, Section 624.155, the Insured's attorney in the CRN contained an inaccurate recitation of the facts, failed to reference specific, relevant insurance policy language; cited irrelevant statutes; failed to offer a valid cure; and relied on inaccurate and conclusory statements. The Insured's laundry list of inapplicable statutes is insufficient. Julien v. United Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 311 So. 3d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

The CRN must be rejected, and it cannot serve as the basis of any action against HCPCI. Upon request by the Florida Department of Financial Services, HCPCI will provide to the DFS detailed correspondence HCPCI provided regarding the claim.

Acknowledgement

The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 794905. Read the filing on the state's site ↗

A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

07WHY THIS ONE IS IN THE ARCHIVE

Cedar Key took Helene’s landfall-adjacent surge and wind on the Big Bend, and this filing describes the strangest letter shape in the library: the carrier’s own adjuster estimated $41,800.28 in actual-cash-value damage, the estimate was produced with a disclaimer that it “should not be construed as an approval or denial of coverage,” and the claim was then denied.

The disclaimer is the tell. Florida requires the carrier to send its detailed estimate within 7 days of creation and to pay or deny within 60, with a written basis. An estimate hedged against meaning anything is a document built to satisfy the delivery rule while dodging the decision rule, and a subsequent denial that contradicts the carrier’s own number hands the policyholder the strongest exhibit a claim can have: the insurer’s math against the insurer’s letter.

When a carrier’s estimate and a carrier’s coverage decision disagree, one of them is wrong on the record. The Civil Remedy filing puts that contradiction in front of the DFS with a 60-day cure clock.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
ANSWER THIS ARGUMENT
SOURCE

Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 794905 (Little v. Homeowners Choice), Cedar Key, FL · public record ↗

Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

02 · FREE LETTER REVIEW

Got a letter like this one?

Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.

The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW