This is a court’s written decision. The judges had the claim file in front of them, and where they quote the insurer’s denial language, that quotation is part of the official record of the case.
Everything quoted below is read off that document. The reading of what it means for each side is ours, and it is marked as such.
| Case | Lemon v. People's Trust Insurance Company |
|---|---|
| Court | Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal |
| Citation | No. 5D21-2771 |
| Decided | June 3, 2022 |
| Who is involved | Florida homeowners and People's Trust Insurance Company. |
| What happened | People's Trust paid a claim with a check whose stub read FULL AND FINAL PAYMENT, then argued that cashing it barred the supplemental claim. The jury verdict for the insurer was reversed. |
| Where | Florida |
| When | Hurricane Matthew. Check reissued December 28. Supplemental damage found about a month after the check was cashed. |
| Why it came out that way | Accord and satisfaction requires a genuine dispute and a clear offer in full settlement. The court held it was error to let the defense stand. |
| The holding | Reversed and remanded for the homeowners. |
Our reading of the document above, not the court's words.
Wording on a check stub is close to free, and if it works it closes the file against every future supplemental claim. The policyholder usually cashes the check because they need the money to start repairs.
Cashing a claim check does not automatically end your claim, and this opinion says so. Florida separately allows supplemental claims for 18 months from the date of loss.
Lemon v. People's Trust Ins. Co., No. 5D21-2771 (Fla. 5th DCA June 3, 2022) Read the document ↗
Case summaries are drafted from the document and have not been reviewed by counsel; verify against the current docket before relying on any of it. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
Not a denial letter, a settlement letter with teeth: cash this check and you have accepted our scope, our amount, and a complete and final resolution. The stub said FULL AND FINAL PAYMENT. The homeowners cashed it, then claimed the additional damage the carrier’s own earlier letter had invited them to supplement.
The Fifth DCA reversed judgment for the carrier: cashing that check was not an accord and satisfaction, in part because the carrier’s own repair-election letter had promised the right to supplement newly discovered covered damage. The two letters contradicted each other, and the contradiction belonged to the drafter.
The entry earns its page because the full-and-final check is a live tactic after every storm, and most policyholders assume endorsement equals surrender. Sometimes it does; the law of accord and satisfaction is genuinely dangerous. But a carrier that writes supplement rights into one letter cannot fully revoke them with a check stub, and this opinion is the citation that says so.
Lemon v. People's Trust Ins. Co., No. 5D21-2771 (Fla. 5th DCA June 3, 2022) · public record ↗
Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.
The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.
A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.
▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.
Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.