ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / DENIALS / THE DOCUMENTS / SLIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
CIVIL REMEDY NOTICE, FILED BY THE POLICYHOLDER WITH FLORIDA DFS

Slide: the Milton below-deductible letter, in the carrier's response

UPDATED 2026-08-21 FL NOT LEGAL ADVICE
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT IS

This is a Civil Remedy Notice: a complaint the POLICYHOLDER filed against the insurer with Florida’s Department of Financial Services. It describes the denial in the policyholder’s words and starts a 60-day clock for the carrier to respond. It is not the insurer’s letter.

Read the regulator filing

Opens the published document this page is built from, on the source's own site.

REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE · MATCHED TO THE ARGUMENT, NOT THE CLAIM
FROM THE FILINGVERBATIM · PUBLIC RECORD
“The total cost to repair the covered damages was less than the Policy's hurricane deductible.”
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 800648 (Bond v. Slide), Bradenton, FL; the carrier's attached response states the ground · read the full document ↗
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT

A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.

So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.

01WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY
Who the filing is against SLIDE INSURANCE COMPANY (NAIC #17227)
Who filed it The policyholder
Attorney of record Raymond Powers
Where the property is Bradenton, Florida
When it was accepted by the state January 13, 2025
When the 60-day cure window closed March 14, 2025
Why, in the state’s own categories Claim Delay, Claim Denial, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice
Type of insurance Residential Property & Casualty
Policy language at issue Loss settlement provision of the policy and Coverage A of the Policy.
Did the insurer respond Yes, on March 11, 2025
02WHAT THE FILING SAYS HAPPENED
THE POLICYHOLDER'S ACCOUNT, QUOTED FROM THE FILING

The carrier has not attempted in good faith to settle the insureds' claim when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insureds and with due regard for their interests. The carrier has done everything possible to delay the claim and refuses to pay the complete covered loss amount due under the policy. Furthermore, the carrier is required to properly investigate and adjust claims and cannot place that burden upon the insureds. This was made clear by the appellate court and the Florida Supreme Court in Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Ruiz, 899 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 2005) ("The Legislature has clearly chosen to impose on the insurance companies a duty to use good faith and fair dealing in processing and litigating the claims of their insureds…"). The carrier was immediately put-on notice of the insured's severe damage claim. The carrier initially attempted to low-ball the claim. The insured subsequently submitted a detailed loss package with extensive supporting documentation in the amount of $ 75,371.00 which is needed to restore the property back to its pre-loss condition to the carrier. The carrier is aware of the entire loss package for the claim submitted by the insured and has still failed to take any meaningful ensuing action. Furthermore, since the commencement of the claim the carrier has failed to timely communicate with the insured. The carrier's failure to respond to the insured's communications within a timely manner is a direct violation of Florida Statute 627.70131. The carrier's conduct makes it clear that they are attempting to intentionally downplay the extent of the damage and undervalue the damages in its estimate for the sole benefit of maximizing the company's profits, thereby placing shareholder's interests ahead of its insureds' interests. It is obvious that the carrier is not attempting to pay for the clearly covered damages owed under the policy and is attempting to delay the claim. This intentional delay with the claim has led to direct prejudice of the insured. To date, the carrier has refused to pay the fully covered amount owed under the policy or even to attempt to treat the claim with good-faith. It is clear that the carrier is not treating the insureds with good faith claims conduct; failing to pay a claim clearly owed and acknowledged in writing; not adjusting the claim and evaluating the loss properly, promptly and fairly to provide full and prompt indemnity to the insured; failing to implement proper standards for the adjustment and investigation of claims; not training, supervising or managing adjusters properly so that prompt and full payments are made, but rather placing the company's interests before the insured's interests; refusing to pay the full amount owed to the insured despite the fact that the damages are covered under the policy; looking for ways to delay full recovery or any recovery to the insured; and refusing to provide coverage for the insured's loss in a timely manner. The carrier's actions are in violation of the Loss Settlement provision of the policy, by failing to tender all sums of money due and owing under the policy, as well as the following Florida Statutes: 624.155(1)(b)(1): Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests. 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a): Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims. 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b): Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue. 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c): Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims. 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f): Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement. 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g): Failing to notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim. This notice is provided in order to perfect a right to pursue the civil remedy authorized by Florida Statute § 624.155. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, the carrier must: 1) Pay all amounts due and owing to the insured in the amount of $ 75,371.00 minus any prior payments and minus the applicable deductible for indemnity benefits; and 2) Review and acknowledge receipt of communication made by the insured in regards to the subject claim; 3) Pay the insured's attorney's fees and costs as the carrier's actions have forced them to retain the undersigned; 4) Pay the statutory interest on the amount of unpaid damages from the date of loss to the date payment is finally made. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Quintaysia Goodley at [phone redacted] if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, [name redacted] D. Powers, Jr. Attorney at Law

WHAT THE FILING DEMANDS THE INSURER DO TO FIX IT

1) Pay all amounts due and owing to the insured in the amount of $ 75,371.00 minus any prior payments and minus the applicable deductible for indemnity benefits; and 2) Review and acknowledge receipt of communication made by the insured in regards to the subject claim; 3) Pay the insured's attorney's fees and costs as the carrier's actions have forced them to retain the undersigned; 4) Pay the statutory interest on the amount of unpaid damages from the date of loss to the date payment is finally made.

03THE LAWS THE FILING SAYS WERE BROKEN

These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.

624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g) Failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim.
04WHAT THE INSURER ANSWERED

Filed with the state on March 11, 2025. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.

Read the insurer's response in full

Via E-mail & Posting on DFS Website [name redacted] Powers, Esq. Kanner & Pintaluga [address redacted], 4th Floor Fort Myers, FL 33901

Complainant: [name redacted] Insured: [name redacted] Claim no. [redacted] Policy no. [redacted] CRN Filing No.: 800648

Dear [name redacted] Powers:

Please allow this correspondence to serve as Slide Insurance Company's ("Slide")'s response to the Civil Remedy Notice ("CRN") filed on behalf of [name redacted] ("Insured"). The CRN was accepted by the Department on January 13, 2025. Without waiving any objections to the sufficiency of the CRN, and specifically subject to a reservation of all rights and defenses herein, Slide denies all allegations that it violated Florida Statutes or other codes, regulations, and/or rules in this matter.

Slide challenges the validity of the CRN as it fails to identify the specific policy terms the Insured claims Slide failed to follow, nor do the allegations as stated give rise to any violation of Florida law or insurance policy. See, e.g., Julien v. United Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 311 So.3d 875, 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021); Demase v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company, 351 So.3d 136, 138-39 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) (holding the trial court properly determined a civil remedy notice that failed to state with specificity the relevant policy language was legally insufficient). In fact, the CRN does not provide any specific facts material to the Insured's claims, including the timeline of the claim, basis of the alleged dispute, or scope of the claimed damages. For these reasons, Slide asserts the CRN is deficient and should be returned by the Department.

CLAIM FACTS

Slide issued a homeowners' insurance policy to the Insured for property located at [address redacted]cle, Bradenton, Florida, in effect for the period from October 9, 2024 to October 9, 2025, (the "Policy"). On October 11, 2024, the Insured filed a claim for damage to their property from Hurricane Milton. The date of loss was reported as October 9, 2024. Slide acknowledged receipt of the claim and assigned a licensed field adjust to inspect the property. A licensed roofing consultant, Precision Claim Solutions LLC ("PCS"), was also retained to complete an evaluation of the tile roofing system at the insured property.

Based on the investigation, Slide advised the Insured on or about December 17, 2024, that the cost to repair the soffits and window screens at the property was covered. The total cost to repair the covered damages was less than the Policy's hurricane deductible; therefore, no payment was due or owing pursuant to the Loss Settlement provisions of the Policy. The December 17th letter further explained that due to the lack of storm-related damage found during PCS's inspection, the roof and interior repairs were precluded from coverage pursuant to the terms, conditions, exclusions, and endorsements of the Policy. In accordance with Florida Statutes, a written explanation of the coverage decision and itemized estimate of the covered damages were provided to the Insured. To date, Slide has not received any information from the Insured or their representatives that would alter its understanding of the loss and coverage.

Slide maintains that it has acted in accordance with the terms of the subject insurance policy and the law in its adjustment of the claim. The facts and circumstances set forth in the CRN are misleading, vague, and incomplete. The Insured has presented no evidence to support the allegations of claim denial, claim delay, unsatisfactory settlement offer, or unfair trade practice. Rather, the facts show Slide promptly investigated the loss and made communications as necessary to adjust the claim, in compliance with the Policy and Florida Statute.

DENIAL OF ALL VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTE

The CRN asserts Slide violated §§ 624.155(1)(b)(1), 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a), 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b), 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c), 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f), and 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g), Fla. Stats. Notwithstanding any challenges to the CRN's legal sufficiency, and specifically subject to a reservation of all defenses and/or rights, Slide categorically denies all violations of Florida Statutes or any other codes, regulations, and/or rules in its handling of the subject loss.

The underlying claim was adjusted in as thorough and expedient a manner as possible. The facts demonstrate Slide employed proper claims practices in the investigation including, but not limited to, a prompt inspection of the Insured's property with licensed individuals, timely communications with the Insured and/or their representatives, and providing a written explanation of the coverage assessment with supporting documentation to the Insured upon completion of the investigation. Thus, the violations asserted in the CRN are baseless and Slide asserts strict compliance with its statutory obligations.

CONCLUSION

In filing this response, Slide does not intend to waive any rights or defenses that it may have in law or the policy. Slide expressly reserves all rights and defenses without exception or limitation.

Should there be any questions or further inquiry with respect to this matter, please contact the undersigned at .

Sincerely,

/s/ Marianne Thornton

Marianne Thornton, Esq. Staff Counsel

Acknowledgement

The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 800648. Read the filing on the state's site ↗

A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

07WHY THIS ONE IS IN THE ARCHIVE

Both sides of a below-deductible fight in one public document: the policyholder’s Civil Remedy Notice demands $75,371 for Milton damage in Bradenton, and Slide’s attached response answers with the standard sentence, the covered repairs cost less than the hurricane deductible.

The response language is the specimen here, because it is the exact wording thousands of Milton policyholders received: not a denial of coverage, a pricing verdict. One sentence carries three load-bearing claims, what counts as covered damages, what the repairs cost, and what the deductible is, and only the third is usually beyond argument. This is Slide’s third appearance in the library, after the Ian letter that cited no policy language and the engineer’s slab-moisture attribution, which together make the carrier a case study in how the same desk answers different storms.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
ANSWER THIS ARGUMENT
SOURCE

Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 800648 (Bond v. Slide), Bradenton, FL; the carrier's attached response states the ground · public record ↗

Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

02 · FREE LETTER REVIEW

Got a letter like this one?

Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.

The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW