ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / DENIALS / THE DOCUMENTS / UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
CIVIL REMEDY NOTICE, FILED BY THE POLICYHOLDER WITH FLORIDA DFS

Universal Property: the moved date of loss and the hurricane deductible

UPDATED 2026-08-21 FL NOT LEGAL ADVICE
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT IS

This is a Civil Remedy Notice: a complaint the POLICYHOLDER filed against the insurer with Florida’s Department of Financial Services. It describes the denial in the policyholder’s words and starts a 60-day clock for the carrier to respond. It is not the insurer’s letter.

Read the regulator filing

Opens the published document this page is built from, on the source's own site.

REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE · MATCHED TO THE ARGUMENT, NOT THE CLAIM
FROM THE FILINGVERBATIM · PUBLIC RECORD
“The adjuster deliberately altered the reported date of loss to August 5, 2024. Due to the wrongful application of the hurricane deductible, the insured was deprived of $6,948.72 rightfully owed under the policy.”
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 794842 (Riley v. Universal P&C), Orange Park, FL · read the full document ↗
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT

A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.

So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.

01WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY
Who the filing is against UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (NAIC #10861)
Who filed it The policyholder
Attorney of record Mohad Abbass
Where the property is Orange Park, Florida
When it was accepted by the state December 2, 2024
When the 60-day cure window closed January 31, 2025
Why, in the state’s own categories Claim Delay, Claim Denial, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice
Type of insurance Residential Property & Casualty
Policy language at issue Coverage A - Dwelling. All Optional Coverage provisions. All Additional Coverage provisions. All Coverage(s) provided by Endorsement or Rider. The Declarations Page. Loss Payment and Settlement provisions. Duties in Event of Loss Policy provision. The insurance policy's definition section. The insurance policy's exclusion of coverage provisions. All insurance policy provisions that provide coverage to the Insured's property. All policy provisions.
Did the insurer respond Yes, on January 21, 2025
02WHAT THE FILING SAYS HAPPENED
THE POLICYHOLDER'S ACCOUNT, QUOTED FROM THE FILING

I. INTRODUCTION This Civil Remedy Notice (CRN) is filed on behalf of the insured, [name redacted] against Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company ("Universal"), for its deliberate actions and statutory violations concerning a property damage claim filed under policy no. [redacted]. [name redacted] sustained damages to his property caused by a covered peril on June 28, 2024. Upon filing a claim, Universal's adjuster intentionally manipulated the date of loss and misapplied the deductible, causing significant financial harm to the insured. These acts were performed with the intent to reduce Universal's liability and minimize its financial obligation to [name redacted] contrary to the terms of the insurance policy and Florida law. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. The Covered Loss On June 28, 2024, [name redacted] 's property sustained significant damages caused by a covered peril under the terms of his policy with Universal. [name redacted] promptly reported the loss to Universal and cooperated fully with the claims process.

2. The Adjuster's [name redacted] inspection, Universal's assigned adjuster correctly documented the loss as occurring on June 28, 2024, as reflected in the insurance company's internal estimates. However, the adjuster deliberately altered the reported date of loss to August 5, 2024. This manipulation was intentional, as the adjusted date triggered a higher hurricane deductible of $9,448.72, rather than the applicable all-other-peril deductible of $2,500.00. By altering the date of loss, the adjuster's actions served to increase the out-of-pocket costs borne by [name redacted] while reducing Universal's financial liability for the claim. This deliberate misrepresentation constitutes bad faith and unfair claims handling in violation of Florida law.

3. The Financial [name redacted] to the wrongful application of the hurricane deductible, [name redacted] was deprived of $6,948.72 that he was rightfully entitled to under the terms of his policy. Despite multiple attempts to resolve this matter amicably and ample evidence that the actual date of loss was June 28, 2024, Universal has refused to rectify this issue or pay the outstanding balance owed to [name redacted] .

4. Universal's Failure to [name redacted] has demonstrated an unwillingness to act in good faith by refusing to acknowledge the improper deductible application and continuing to withhold funds owed to the insured. This refusal has caused [name redacted] to experience unnecessary financial hardship, as well as additional damages in the form of accrued interest on the wrongfully withheld payment. III. VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES Universal's actions, including the adjuster's intentional manipulation of the date of loss and the improper application of the deductible, violate the following sections of Florida Statutes:

1. Florida Statute 624.155(1)(b)(1): Failing to settle claims in good faith where it could and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly toward the insured and with due regard for his interests.

2. Florida Statute 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a): Engaging in unfair claims settlement practices by misrepresenting pertinent facts or policy provisions related to coverages. Universal's adjuster intentionally altered the date of loss to increase the deductible unfairly.

3. Florida Statute 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b): Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims. Universal ignored multiple communications from [name redacted] attempting to resolve the discrepancy in the deductible and date of loss.

4. Florida Statute 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(i): Conducting unfair claims settlement practices by altering the date of loss to create a financial advantage for the insurer at the insured's expense. IV. REMEDY SOUGHT [name redacted] respectfully demands that Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company immediately:

1. Correct the Date of Loss: Acknowledge that the date of loss for the claim is June 28, 2024, and amend all records to reflect this accurate date.

2. Apply the [name redacted] : Adjust the deductible to the all-other-peril deductible of $2,500.00, as required by the policy terms for the loss sustained on June 28, 2024.

3. Pay the [name redacted] : Issue payment for the withheld amount of $6,948.72, along with applicable interest accrued due to the delay in payment.

4. [name redacted] Assurance: Provide a written acknowledgment of the insurer's errors and confirmation that the claim has been adjusted appropriately and in compliance with Florida law.

5. [name redacted] Damages: Compensate [name redacted] for any additional damages, including interest and costs incurred due to Universal's bad faith actions. V. NOTICE TO INSURER This Civil Remedy Notice is filed pursuant to Florida Statutes and must be responded to within 60 days of filing. Failure to address the violations outlined herein, including failure to settle the claim fairly and promptly, will result in further legal action against Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, including but not limited to a lawsuit for bad faith damages under Florida law.

03THE LAWS THE FILING SAYS WERE BROKEN

These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.

624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(i) Failing to pay personal injury protection insurance claims within the time periods required by s. 627.736(4)(b).
04WHAT THE INSURER ANSWERED

Filed with the state on January 21, 2025. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.

Read the insurer's response in full

January 21, 2025

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Florida Department of Financial Services Bureau of Consumer Assistance Civil Remedy Section [address redacted]reet Tallahassee, FL 32399-0322

Re: DFS File No.: 794842 Filing Date: 12/2/2024 Complainant(s): [name redacted] Insured(s): [name redacted] Policy no. [redacted] Claim no. [redacted]

Dear Sir/Madam:

Please allow this to serve as Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company's ("Universal") formal response to the above-referenced Civil Remedy Notice ("Notice") filed by attorney, [name redacted] Abbass, on behalf of Complainant, [name redacted] (also referenced as "Insured.")

The Notice alleges violations of Sections 624.155 and 626.9541, Florida Statutes. Universal specifically denies the allegations contained in the Notice. Additionally, Universal denies that it violated these or any statutes, Florida law or policy provisions and disputes any allegations regarding the claim adjustment of this matter. With that said, Universal asserts that the Notice fails to comply with the specific notice and information requirements as set forth in Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violation document provisions, Section 624.155, Florida Statutes and Florida law.

Here, the Notice fails to meet the requirements of Fla. Stat. § 624.155 on several grounds. First, the Notice fails to allege sufficient facts to notify Universal of the alleged violations.?Second, the Notice fails to satisfy the requirement to identify the person or persons representing the insurer most responsible for or knowledgeable of the facts giving rise to the allegations. Third, the Notice fails to satisfy Fla. Statute § 624.155(3)(b)(4) in that it fails to reference policy language relevant to the alleged violation. Fourth, the Notice does not provide a proper means whereby Universal can "cure" the alleged defects. Finally, the Complainant failed to respond to each of the fields set forth on the DFS Form with the requisite specificity. Therefore, the Notice is insufficient and fails to satisfy the condition precedent to filing a bad faith action. See Pin-Pon Corp. v. Landmark American Ins. Co., 500 F. Supp. 3d 1336 (S.D. Fla. 2020); see Julien v. United Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 311 So.3d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Notwithstanding the above referenced deficiencies, the parties reached an amicable resolution of the disputed claim in exchange for a full Release of Claims, thus curing any alleged violations. In addition, the Notice was withdrawn on December 2, 2024, by [name redacted] Abbass, counsel for the Complainant.

Throughout the handling of the Insured's claim, Universal acted in good faith toward the interests of its policyholder. Universal has timely and fairly investigated the reported loss in accordance with Florida law, the policy provisions, and standard claims handling practices. Notwithstanding, any alleged dispute between the parties has been resolved via an amicable resolution in exchange for a full Release of Claims. Thus, it is Universal's best understanding that the subject claim has been fully adjusted and concluded.

Accordingly, the alleged statutory violations and factual allegations of wrongdoing set forth in the Notice are without merit. Universal has complied with all policy provisions and applicable Florida law regarding the adjustment of this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ [name redacted] Esq. Associate General Counsel

12-02-2024

This CRN is withdrawn by the insured. No response is needed because the matter has been resolved.

Acknowledgement

The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 794842. Read the filing on the state's site ↗

A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

07WHY THIS ONE IS IN THE ARCHIVE

The date of loss is worth money, and this filing shows exactly how much: $6,948.72. The policyholder reported a June 28 loss; per the filing, the adjuster moved the date to August 5, Hurricane Debby’s landfall date, which swapped the flat all-perils deductible for the percentage hurricane deductible and consumed most of the payment.

A hurricane deductible legally applies only to losses caused by a named hurricane during its Florida windows, and reclassifying a pre-storm loss into a storm loss is deductible arithmetic dressed as adjusting. The filing calls the alteration deliberate; that characterization is the policyholder’s allegation, and the carrier’s response sits in the same public record. What is not in dispute is the mechanism, which is why the anatomy guide tells every reader to verify the date of loss on the caption block first: it is the single number on the letter that silently reprices the whole claim.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
ANSWER THIS ARGUMENT
SOURCE

Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 794842 (Riley v. Universal P&C), Orange Park, FL · public record ↗

Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

02 · FREE LETTER REVIEW

Got a letter like this one?

Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.

The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW