ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / THE STATUTE LIBRARY / S.C. CODE 38-59-40
STATUTE · SOUTH CAROLINA · TITLE 38, CH. 59

S.C. Code 38-59-40: attorney fees when the insurer refuses to pay

This is the section that gives a South Carolina policyholder leverage. Refuse a covered claim for ninety days after a demand, without reasonable cause or in bad faith, and the carrier can be ordered to pay the policyholder’s attorney fees on top of the judgment. Four elements, one cap, and a demand you should date.

UPDATED AUG 20268 MIN READSOUTH CAROLINA LAW NOT LEGAL ADVICE
GET A FREE CASE REVIEW →
REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE

Can my insurance company be made to pay my attorney fees in South Carolina?

Yes, under S.C. Code 38-59-40. When a covered claim goes unpaid for ninety days after you demand payment, and the trial judge finds the refusal was without reasonable cause or in bad faith, the insurer is liable for your reasonable attorney fees. The judge sets the amount and adds it to the judgment, capped at one third.

Statute S.C. Code Ann. 38-59-40, Title 38, Chapter 59, Claims Practices
The trigger A covered claim refused for 90 days after a demand by the policyholder
The finding Trial judge finds the refusal was without reasonable cause or in bad faith
The award Reasonable fees for prosecuting the case, added to the judgment
The cap No more than one third of the judgment; an affirmed appeal adds a further fee
UPDATED AUGUST 22, 2026
THE SECTION, IN FIVE LINES
  • The claim has to be covered by the policy, and the insurer has to refuse to pay it for ninety days after a demand by the policyholder.
  • The trial judge, not a jury, must find that the refusal was without reasonable cause or in bad faith.
  • The award is all reasonable attorney fees for prosecuting the case, set by the trial judge and added to the judgment.
  • The fee may not exceed one third of the amount of the judgment.
  • If the defendant appeals and the judgment is affirmed, the appellate court adds a further reasonable fee for the appeal. Subsection (4) applies the section in federal court.
ON THIS PAGE
01THE ELEMENTS

Four moving parts, and all four have to be there

38-59-40 is short, and every phrase in it is doing work. Read it as a checklist rather than a principle.

01 A covered claim, loss, or damage The section opens on a claim, loss, or damage covered by a policy of insurance. A genuine coverage dispute is a different fight, and it is fought first.
02 A demand by the policyholder The ninety days run from a demand made by the holder of the policy. The statute does not prescribe a form, which is a reason to make yours written, specific, and dated.
03 Refusal to pay for ninety days after that demand Not ninety days from the loss and not ninety days from the claim. Ninety days from the demand, with the claim still refused.
04 A judicial finding on the refusal On suit, the trial judge must find the refusal was without reasonable cause or in bad faith. That finding is the whole case: reasonableness is judged on the carrier’s own file.

Element four is the contest. Reasonableness is proved out of the carrier's own claim file: the adjuster notes, the inspection or the absence of one, the estimate, and whether the stated reason survives the investigation behind it. The conduct list in S.C. Code 38-59-20 is the state's own description of what unreasonable handling looks like, which makes it the natural framework for the argument.

02THE STATUTE

What the section actually says

STATUTORY TEXT · 38-59-40SUBSECTIONS (1) TO (4)

(1) A covered claim refused “within ninety days after a demand has been made by the holder of the policy,” where the trial judge finds on suit “that the refusal was without reasonable cause or in bad faith,” makes the insurer liable for “all reasonable attorneys’ fees for the prosecution of the case.” The trial judge determines the amount and adds it to the judgment, and it “may not exceed one-third of the amount of the judgment.”

(2) If fees are allowed and the defendant appeals and the judgment is affirmed, the appellate court allows the respondent an additional sum it adjudges reasonable as fees on the appeal.

(3) Nothing in the section alters or affects the Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. doctrine.

(4) The section applies to cases filed or removed to federal court and cases appealed in the federal court system.

S.C. Code Ann. 38-59-40, condensed with the operative phrases quoted · read the full section at scstatehouse.gov ↗

Note what the section does not require. There is no notice to the Director of Insurance, no waiting period beyond the ninety days, and no separate cause of action to plead the fee remedy into existence. It attaches to the case you were going to bring anyway.

03THE DEMAND

The demand is the start line, so date it

The ninety-day count begins with a demand by the holder of the policy. A phone call can be a demand and then become an argument about what was said; a dated letter cannot. Write the policy number, the date of loss, the amount demanded, and what supports the number, then send it so delivery is provable and keep the proof with the claim file. The sample letters are built for exactly this, and the anatomy of a denial letter shows what you are answering.

Keep the demand separate from the claim report in your own records. Those are two different dates doing two different jobs: the report starts the carrier's handling obligations under 38-59-20, and the demand starts the ninety days under this section.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
04THE MATH

One third of the judgment, plus the appeal

The trial judge determines the reasonable fee and adds it to the judgment, and the statute caps that amount at one third of the judgment. The cap ties the fee to the recovery, which is why the underlying valuation work, the estimate, the scope, and the documentation, drives the fee exposure as much as the conduct does.

Subsection (2) adds a second layer: when the defendant appeals and the judgment is affirmed, the appellate court allows the respondent an additional reasonable fee for the appeal. Subsection (4) carries the section into federal court, which matters because carriers routinely remove South Carolina property cases on diversity grounds. Subsection (3) preserves the Tyger River doctrine, a separate line of South Carolina insurance law that this section leaves untouched.

05HOW IT PAIRS

Fee shifting is not the whole case

38-59-40 pays your lawyer. It does not compensate you for what the refusal cost you. That is the work of the South Carolina common-law bad-faith action, which reaches consequential damages and, on the right facts, punitive damages. Both are usually pursued alongside the breach of contract claim for the policy benefit itself, and all three are proved out of the same file.

Florida solves the same problem differently. Fla. Stat. 624.155 creates a statutory bad-faith action that starts with a Civil Remedy Notice filed with the state and a 60-day cure window, and Fla. Stat. 626.9541(1)(i) supplies the list of unfair claim settlement practices that notice cites. South Carolina has no equivalent pre-suit filing. Here the demand letter does that job. The statute library runs both states side by side.

06IN THE RECORD

What an unreasonable refusal looks like on paper

The South Carolina anchor entry in the denial documents is a Helene claim: a tree through the roof of a Lake Murray home on September 26, 2024, a carrier position letter dated December 31, 2024, eight different adjusters pleaded across the year that followed, and a supplement of $21,250.07 offered on November 3, 2025. The federal complaint is public and free to read.

That file is the shape this statute was written for. The refusal is not one letter, it is a year of handling, and the fee question is whether any of it was reasonable. Read the entry: the State Farm Helene tree-through-roof claim , then run yours through the six-point test in is your denial letter legal.

One clock is running the whole time. S.C. Code 15-3-530 puts a three-year limitation on contract and policy actions, so a Helene refusal that is still open is business into late 2027 and no longer after that. Fee shifting is worth nothing on a claim that is time barred.

07FAQ

Questions about 38-59-40

What counts as a demand under S.C. Code 38-59-40? +

The statute says the ninety days run after a demand has been made by the holder of the policy, and it does not set out a form. The practical answer is to remove the argument: put the demand in writing, state the policy number and the date of loss, state the amount you are demanding and what supports it, and send it so delivery is provable. Then the ninety-day count has a start date the carrier cannot dispute. Confirm the wording with a South Carolina attorney.

Do the ninety days run from the date of loss? +

No. They run from the demand. A claim reported the week of the storm and demanded eight months later starts the ninety-day clock at the demand, not the storm. That is the opposite of the deadlines that run against you, which start at the loss, so the two dates need to be tracked separately.

How much can the fee award be? +

The trial judge determines the amount of reasonable attorney fees for prosecuting the case and adds it to the judgment, and the statute caps it: the amount of the attorneys fees may not exceed one third of the amount of the judgment. A separate subsection provides that if the defendant appeals and the judgment is affirmed, the appellate court allows the respondent an additional reasonable fee for the appeal.

Does the section work if my case is in federal court? +

Subsection (4) of S.C. Code 38-59-40 states that the section applies to cases filed or removed to federal court and cases appealed in the federal court system. That matters in practice because carriers frequently remove South Carolina property cases to the District of South Carolina on diversity grounds.

Is a fee award the same as winning a bad-faith case? +

No. 38-59-40 is fee shifting, not damages. It pays your lawyer out of the carrier, capped at a third of the judgment. South Carolina common-law bad faith is a separate action for the harm the unreasonable refusal caused, with consequential damages and, on the right facts, punitive exposure. They are usually pursued together with the breach of contract claim.

SOURCES
  • S.C. Code Ann. 38-59-40 (attorney fees where the insurer has refused to pay), 38-59-20 (improper claim practices) · scstatehouse.gov ↗
  • S.C. Code Ann. 15-3-530 (three-year limitation) · scstatehouse.gov ↗
  • Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. 3:25-cv-13575 (D.S.C., filed Nov. 25, 2025), Complaint · courtlistener.com ↗
  • South Carolina Department of Insurance, Office of Consumer Services · doi.sc.gov ↗

Statute summaries drafted August 2026 and simplified for education; verify against current statute. Case allegations are the plaintiff's, taken from the cited public filing. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

08 · FREE CLAIM REVIEW

Ninety days is not a suggestion.

Send the demand, the dates, and the carrier's answer. You will get a straight read on whether the refusal looks unreasonable on this record, and what a South Carolina fee claim would need.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
KEEP READING
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW