ACTIVE STORM TROPICAL STORM DOLLY, 40 MPH, MOVING W 28 TRACK DOLLY →
PROPERTY-INSURANCE CLAIM HELP FL CITIESSC CITIESGUIDESTATESNEWSSITE MAPABOUT
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO
HOME / DENIALS / THE DOCUMENTS / MONARCH NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
CIVIL REMEDY NOTICE, FILED BY THE POLICYHOLDER WITH FLORIDA DFS

Monarch National: coverage opened, $0.00 tendered

UPDATED 2026-08-21 FL NOT LEGAL ADVICE
WHAT THIS DOCUMENT IS

This is a Civil Remedy Notice: a complaint the POLICYHOLDER filed against the insurer with Florida’s Department of Financial Services. It describes the denial in the policyholder’s words and starts a 60-day clock for the carrier to respond. It is not the insurer’s letter.

Read the regulator filing

Opens the published document this page is built from, on the source's own site.

REPRESENTATIVE FOOTAGE · MATCHED TO THE ARGUMENT, NOT THE CLAIM
FROM THE FILINGVERBATIM · PUBLIC RECORD
“Monarch National Insurance Company has opened coverage but falls below the insured's deductible. Monarch National Insurance Company has tendered $0.00.”
Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 657015 (Nelson v. Monarch National), Wimauma, FL · read the full document ↗
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT

A Civil Remedy Notice is a formal complaint filed against an insurance company with Florida's Department of Financial Services. Filing one is the step Florida law requires before a policyholder can sue an insurer for bad faith. It is a public record, and the insurer gets 60 days to fix the problem before that right opens up.

So this is the policyholder's side of a dispute, written by their side, and it is an allegation rather than a finding. The insurer answered it, and its answer is published below alongside the complaint. Read both. Names, addresses, and policy and claim numbers have been removed here; everything else is quoted from the filing.

01WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY
Who the filing is against MONARCH NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (NAIC #15715)
Who filed it A representative filing on the policyholder’s behalf
Where the property is Not stated. The address on the form is the representative’s office in St. Petersburg, not the property.
When it was accepted by the state November 14, 2022
When the 60-day cure window closed January 13, 2023
Why, in the state’s own categories Claim Delay, Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer, Unfair Trade Practice
Type of insurance Residential Property & Casualty
Policy language at issue SECTION I - PROPERTY COVERAGES A. Coverage A - Dwelling 1. We cover: a. The dwelling on the "residence premises" shown in the Declarations, including structures attached to the dwelling, and SECTION I - PERILS INSUREDAGAINST A. Coverage A - Dwelling And Coverage B - Other Structures 1. We insure against risk of direct physical loss to property described in Coverages A and B. Loss Payment We will adjust all losses with you. We will pay you unless some other person is named in the policy or is legally entitled to receive payment. Loss will be payable 60 days after we receive your proof of loss In addition, it is believed that the following policy provisions are applicable: Duties in event of loss policy provision All terms, conditions and sections of the insurance policy, including, but not limited to: Section 1 of the insurance policy Property coverages Section 1 - perils insured against Coverage A- dwelling We insure against risk of direct physical loss to property described in coverages A and B. FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTIONS VIOLATED In addition to the statutory violations referenced above, the Insured states that Monarch National Insurance Company violated the following Florida Administrative Code Sections: 69B-220.201(3)(a) Adjuster shall disclose all financial interests and any direct or indirect aspect of an adjusted transaction. 69B-220.201(3)(b) An adjuster shall treat all claims equally. An adjuster shall not provide favored treatment to any claimant. Adjuster shall adjust all claims strictly in accordance with the insurance contract. 69B-220.201(3)(c) An adjuster shall never approach investigations, adjustments, and settlements in a manner prejudicial to the insured. 69B-220.201(3)(e) An adjuster shall handle every adjustment and settlement with honesty, integrity, and allow fair adjustment or settlement to all parties without any remuneration to himself except to that which he is legally entitled. 69B-220.201(3)(f) An adjuster, upon undertaking the handling of a claim, shall act with dispatch and due diligence in achieving a proper disposition thereof. 69B-220.201(3)(m) An adjuster shall not knowingly fail to advise a claimant of their rights in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract and applicable laws of the state of Florida.
Did the insurer respond Yes, on December 30, 2022
02WHAT THE FILING SAYS HAPPENED
THE POLICYHOLDER'S ACCOUNT, QUOTED FROM THE FILING

In Florida, the work of adjusting insurance claims engages the public trust. Monarch National Insurance Company has breached the public's trust by its adjustment of [name redacted] 's ("Insured") claim of loss. Monarch National Insurance Company underpaid the customer based on the estimate provided to Monarch National Insurance Company by the insured's public adjuster. Monarch National Insurance Company has opened coverage but falls below the insured's deductible. Monarch National Insurance Company has tendered $0.00. Our estimate for repairs to place the insured back to pre-loss condition totals $30,897.44 after deductible. Monarch National Insurance Company has placed their insured in a vulnerable financial position to force a lesser settlement. Monarch National Insurance Company has failed to create and implement adequate guidelines for the proper investigation and evaluation of claims, claims handling, and for training and supervision of employees resulting in statutory violations as set forth above in paragraph No. 5. Monarch National Insurance Company has failed and/or refused to thoroughly, accurately, and completely investigate and evaluate the Insured's insurance claim for damages. Notwithstanding the Insured's timely notification to Monarch National Insurance Company of the insurance claim, Monarch National Insurance Company has failed or refused to settle the Insured's claim in a timely manner and/or adjust the loss with the Insured. Monarch National Insurance Company has failed to promptly settle its Insured's insurance claim when the obligation to settle the insurance claim had become reasonably clear. To date, notwithstanding the Insured's pleas otherwise, Monarch National Insurance Company has continued to refuse to acknowledge its obligation to conduct a proper investigation, and to tender the insurance monies due and owing its Insured under the policy. This claim involves the Insured's property located at [address redacted]ive Wimauma, FL which suffered a sudden loss caused by hurricane on or about 9/28/2022. The Insured made application for insurance benefits under the Policy no. [redacted], under Claim no. [redacted]. Monarch National Insurance Company partially accepted coverage for the loss, however, has failed to pay the full amount of benefits due to the Insured. The insureds utilized the services of a licensed public adjuster who inspected the insureds' property and determined that the loss was a covered loss and had caused $30,897.44 in damages after the deductible. The insureds' public adjuster prepared an estimate for the insureds using XACTIMATE software that incorporated standard industry pricing and accurately reflects the repairs necessary to return the insureds' property to its pro-loss condition. The Insured was, and still is, forced to expend out of pocket monies to submit the insurance claim, e.g., retaining legal counsel and other experts to force Monarch National Insurance Company to honor its obligations under the insurance policy and to pay all the insurance proceeds due and owing to the Insured. Monarch National Insurance Company adjusted the loss and tendered insurance benefits of $0.00 and has refused and/or failed to tender additional insurance proceeds due and owing to the Insured. Monarch National Insurance Company's refusal and/or failure to settle the insurance claim when under all circumstances it could have and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly towards its Insured is wrongful conduct. Furthermore, the Insured contends that Monarch National Insurance Company's adjusters and/or representatives financially benefit from such wrongful conduct. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, Monarch National Insurance Company must: (1) Create and implement adequate guidelines for the proper investigation and evaluation of claims and for the training and supervision of employees, which will avoid future statutory violations as set forth above in paragraph No. 5, and prevent this from occurring in the future; (2) Monarch National Insurance Company must create and implement adequate guidelines for the proper investigation and evaluation of these type of claims and for the training and supervision of employees with regard to these claims to ensure that the claims handling procedure with regard to these types of losses are adequate to prevent other insureds from being treated unfairly and wrongfully; (3) Monarch National Insurance Company must tender to the Insured, $30,897.44, plus interest, fees and costs; and (4) Monarch National Insurance Company must act fairly and honestly towards its Insured and with due regard for the Insured's interests in attempting to settle its Insured's claim.

03THE LAWS THE FILING SAYS WERE BROKEN

These are the statutes named on the form. The wording under each is the statute's own, as the state prints it on the notice.

624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(i) Failing to pay personal injury protection insurance claims within the time periods required by s. 627.736(4)(b).
04WHAT THE INSURER ANSWERED

Filed with the state on December 30, 2022. This is the insurer's own written response to the complaint above, quoted from the same public record.

Read the insurer's response in full

December 30, 2022

Via E-mail & Posting on DFS Website:

[name redacted] Bay Area Public Adjuster c/o [name redacted] Bay Area Public Adjuster, Inc. P.O. Box [address redacted] Petersburg, FL

RE: Claimant: [name redacted] Bay Area Public Adjuster aao [name redacted] Insureds: [name redacted] Claim no. [redacted] Policy no. [redacted] Loss Location: [address redacted], Wilmauma, FL CRN Filing Number: 657015

Dear Ms. [name redacted] Mr. [name redacted] :

Please allow this correspondence to serve as Monarch National Insurance Company's ("Monarch") objection and initial response to the referenced Civil Remedy Notice ("CRN") that was filed on behalf of [name redacted] Bay Area Public Adjuster, Inc., reserving all rights, claims and defenses. As a preliminary matter, and to prevent prejudice to Monarch, Monarch objects to the CRN and asserts that the CRN has substantive defects and is invalid. The CRN does not supply facts or circumstances that explain the allegations and the basis for alleged violations. Rather, it includes blanket allegations, omits facts regarding communications, investigation, and other facts, makes vague and misleading assertions regarding the policy and coverage, fails to acknowledge coverage conditions and limitations, and fails to explain how the actual facts constitute violations of Florida law. Moreover, the CRN fails to reference all policy language that is relevant to the alleged violations and does not supply necessary information that would allow Monarch to "cure" the alleged violations, as required by Florida law. Instead, the CRN contains a list of statutes in boilerplate fashion, vaguely refers to the policy for alleged violations and includes vague references for a cure, which do not comply with the specificity requirements and do not provide the requisite notice. Monarch would be forced to speculate and guess as to all of the specific policy language was allegedly violated and what it would have to do to cure. In a good faith effort, Monarch contacted the public adjuster for additional information, including but not limited to items referenced in the CRN and what is being demanded to cure the alleged violations. These discussions may be ongoing, but Monarch lacks sufficient information at this time. As a result, Monarch asserts that it is prejudiced and that it is unable to determine an appropriate cure or provide a complete and meaningful response to the CRN.

As a further precaution, and without waiving any rights, defenses and objections as to the invalidity and defective nature of the CRN, Monarch denies each and every allegation asserted in the CRN and denies any wrongdoing in the handling of the underlying claim. Additionally, Monarch denies violating any Florida Statute or Administrative Code and denies violating any provisions or duties set forth in the applicable policy of insurance. Monarch acted diligently in its claims response and adequately performed its obligations under the policy of insurance and Florida law. Monarch would further state that the allegations set forth in the CRN are incomplete and misleading, and do not give rise to violations of any statute or policy provision referenced in the Notice. Without waiving any rights, defenses and objections as to the invalidity and defective nature of the CRN, Monarch was prejudiced from the insured's failure to produce requested records and to comply with other post loss duties. Monarch asserts that it has acted in good faith towards its insureds and asserts that it has acted properly in responding to the underlying claim and in compliance with its contractual and legal obligations.

Please note that nothing herein should be deemed as an admission or waiver by Monarch. Monarch hereby expressly reserves all rights, defenses and objections without exception or limitation, including but not limited to the right to appraisal, to cure, and to supplement and/or amend this initial objection and response. If you, or anyone at the Department, have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Attorney Tyler Acham, at .

Sincerely,

/s/ [name redacted] Esq. Associate In-House Counsel

FedNat Adjusting [address redacted]reet, Suite 180, Sunrise, Florida Phone: [phone redacted] • Fax: [phone redacted] FedNat.com

Acknowledgement

The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Florida DFS Civil Remedy Notice, filing number 657015. Read the filing on the state's site ↗

A Civil Remedy Notice records an allegation, not a finding. Nothing here has been decided by a court or by the Department. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

07WHY THIS ONE IS IN THE ARCHIVE

Two sentences from the public filing tell the whole below-deductible story: coverage opened, $0.00 tendered. The carrier agrees the peril is covered and the damage is real; the only thing standing between the policyholder and payment is the carrier’s own opinion of what the repair costs.

That structure is why below-deductible letters are the most beatable letters in the library. There is no exclusion to fight and no causation battle to win; the entire dispute is a number, and numbers are answered with better numbers: an independent contractor’s estimate of the full scope, decking to interior, code upgrades included. FLOIR’s Milton data would later make this the most common closure reason in Florida, 38.5% of everything closed without payment. This Ian-era filing shows the same letter, two years earlier, in Hillsborough County’s farm country.

FREE CASE REVIEWDenied, underpaid, or delayed? Get a free attorney case review, no fee unless you recover.START MY REVIEW
ANSWER THIS ARGUMENT
SOURCE

Fla. DFS Civil Remedy Notice, Filing No. 657015 (Nelson v. Monarch National), Wimauma, FL · public record ↗

Quotes are verbatim from the cited public record. Case status and statute summaries drafted August 2026; verify against the current docket and statute. Not legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

02 · FREE LETTER REVIEW

Got a letter like this one?

Upload it. You'll get a straight answer on which argument the carrier is running, how the same argument has fared on the record, and what the strongest next move is.

The library grows one letter at a time. Letters shared with permission are published redacted, with the policyholder's details removed.

CASE FILE · HL-2026 · INTAKE OPEN
FREE CASE REVIEW
PROPERTY INSURANCE CLAIM
REVIEWED BY HALVERSEN LAW
01Who you are
02Your claim
03Your documents
Drop your documents here, or tap to browse
Denial letter · policy · adjuster estimate · damage photos, PDF, JPG, PNG, HEIC or DOC, up to 25MB each
08LAW FIRM
Halversen Law logo
Property-insurance attorneys · Licensed in SC & FL4.8on Google
LAW FIRM · SC & FL

Denied or underpaid? Fight it with the carriers’ own playbook.

LICENSED · SOUTH CAROLINALICENSED · FLORIDA

Halversen Law is a property-insurance law firm licensed in South Carolina and Florida that represents policyholders, never carriers. Since 2008, the firm has taken on denied, underpaid, and delayed claims across the full range of storm and property losses: wind and hurricane damage, water disputes, roof claims, and commercial and condominium losses. Its attorneys spent the early part of their careers defending insurance companies, and now use that inside knowledge of the carrier playbook, how an adjuster builds a denial and where the file is weak, to fight for the policyholder on the other side of it. Cases are handled on contingency: no fee unless you recover.

No fee
Unless you recover
20+ yrs
Property-insurance experience
SC & FL
Licensed in both states
WHAT THE FIRM HANDLES
Denied claimsUnderpaid claimsDelay & bad faithWind & hurricaneWater & floodRoof damageCommercial & condo
HOW THE FIRM FIGHTS
01
Rebuild the evidence
Pre-storm condition, address-specific wind data, and an independent inspection.
02
Answer scope with scope
The carrier estimate countered line by line with a full documented estimate.
03
Apply the deadline law
Notice, supplemental, and suit windows under Florida and South Carolina statute.
04
Escalate when it pays
Appraisal, civil remedy notice, and bad-faith litigation when the carrier will not deal.
CREDENTIALSLicensed in South Carolina & FloridaProperty-insurance litigationPolicyholder representation since 2008Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedFormer insurance-defense background
CASE REVIEW
No fee unless you recover.
CALL OR TEXT · NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL
WHAT CLIENTS SAY4.8on Google
C
Cynthia Speigh
Google review
“I am writing to express my sincere appreciation for his exceptional service.”
J
James Parker
Google review
“What impressed me was his research and knowledge of the applicable laws, his approach to my case, and comparisons to similar cases in other states.”
T
Trey Muckenfuss
Google review
“Great to work with, and he really battles for you.”
R
Rick Gaston
Google review
“Mr. Halversen took on an insurance fraud case for my company that almost put us in a serious financial bind.”
F
Freeman Barber
Google review
“Reliable, responsive, extremely knowledgeable, and does a tremendous job. A pleasure to work with.”
C
Charles Wallace
Google review
“An outstanding lawyer who can handle a wide variety of matters, from simple matters to full-blown litigation.”
EVERY STATEOutside Florida or South Carolina? We'll connect you with a vetted property-insurance attorney licensed in your state. Same review, no obligation.START A REVIEW →
HurricaneLaw.Pro, Florida and South Carolina property insurance claim resource HURRICANELAW.PRO

A comprehensive property-insurance claim resource for policyholders: denied and underpaid claims, coverage and bad-faith law, storm dossiers, carrier profiles, city guides, and the complete claims playbook. Florida and South Carolina.

▸ SEE THE FULL SITE MAP →
STORM ALERTS SOURCED FROM NOAA / NHC
SOUTH CAROLINA
496 Bramson Court, Suite 100
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
CALL OR TEXT
FLORIDA
CALL OR TEXT
STORM ARCHIVE, CITIES & NEWS
Most recent below. Every storm dossier, city resource, and article is on its hub (linked at each heading) or the grouped site map →. All 81 carriers and 95 public-adjuster firms are in the Directories column above.
STORM ARCHIVE · 51 →
FLORIDA CITY RESOURCES · 37 →
SOUTH CAROLINA CITY RESOURCES · 8 →
NEWS & UPDATES · 20 →

Coverage summaries, policy-language quotations, dollar figures, deadlines, and chart examples throughout this site are general information based on typical or standard policy forms and are illustrative only: they are not a quote, a guarantee of coverage, or a promise of any outcome. Every insurance policy is different: your own policy, endorsements, and state law control, so read your policy and confirm current statutes. Weather imagery courtesy of NOAA, the National Hurricane Center, and the National Weather Service. Legal services are provided by Halversen Law. Nothing on this site is legal advice; consult an attorney about your specific claim.

PrivacyTermsDisclaimerAboutContact
This site is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for an attorney. We build the best claim resource we can, but anything legal needs a licensed lawyer reading your policy and your facts. We recommend Halversen Law: the free claim review is the fastest way to get real eyes on your claim.
© 2026 HURRICANELAW.PRO · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 27.9°N 82.5°W · ATLANTIC BASIN MONITOR
LAW FIRM
Halversen Law LICENSED · FLORIDA & SOUTH CAROLINA

Legal matters are handled by Halversen Law, a law firm licensed in Florida and South Carolina.

FREE CASE REVIEW